The 2-1 majority disagreed with Murphy’s contention and said the company “overreads” the limit of the law’s congressional commitment to timber production in the O&C Act, and that it “improperly discount[ed]” the statute’s delegation of authority to the Department of Interior and its secretary for managing land from the act for uses other than timber.
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey, Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section…
[I will blog the NetChoice v. Bonta ruling very soon.] Many state legislatures draft Internet regulations without any genuine concern for whether or not the…
[I’m far behind in my blogging queue, especially with respect to the social media addiction rulings.] I previously summarized this case: Rogalinski made several posts…
Introduction It’s become a popular political sport to attack TikTok. Those attacks combine Sinophobia with anti-Big Tech sentiments, a double-whammy of political payoffs that’s addictive…
No one has followed lawsuits by male students seeking relief from the denial of due process in campus Title IX sex tribunals more closely than…
Please confirm you want to block this member.
You will no longer be able to:
Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.
Responses