At Arizona Supreme Court Arguments, Attorneys Spar Over ‘Stacking’ Auto Insurance Policies
Related Articles
At Arizona Supreme Court Arguments, Attorneys Spar Over ‘Stacking’ Auto Insurance Policies
“In two decades, neither this court, nor plaintiffs attorneys, nor anyone else, until now, has found that inter-policy stacking exists in Arizona,” said Kymberly Kochis,…
Eversheds Sutherland Appoints Erin Meszaros to Global Business Development and Marketing Officer
ATLANTA, GA—Eversheds Sutherland is pleased to announce that US Chief Business Development and Client Service Officer Erin Meszaros will serve as the firm’s first Global…
Major Law Firms Form Consortium to Develop AI Training through SkillBurst Interactive; Subscription Access Available to Other Firms
Eleven prominent international law firms have formed a first-of-its-kind consortium to build a series of on-demand and interactive training programs in generative AI for lawyers…
Does California’s Anti-Discrimination Law Ban Ad Targeting?–Liapes v. Facebook
This opinion indicates that Facebook–and by implication, every other ad network–could violate California’s Unruh Act (an anti-discrimination law) by targeting third-party ads based on age,…
NM Supreme Court Clarifies Stacking UM/UIM Coverage, to Be Applied Prospectively
“We hold that, in recognition of the practical reality that insurers now permit stacking as a matter of course in New Mexico, offers of UM/UIM…
Responses