Making both statutory and equal-rights arguments, two separate lawyers, including one from the ACLU, argued before Michigan’s high court that an unwed former same-sex partner should qualify as a legal “parent” to a child her and her former partner agreed to have, via in vitro fertilization, but that one partner is no longer allowed to see.
[I will blog the NetChoice v. Bonta ruling very soon.] Many state legislatures draft Internet regulations without any genuine concern for whether or not the…
There is a significant correlation between a child having two parents, regardless of whether they are of different sexes or the same sex, and success.…
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey, Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section…
This content contains links to companies that may compensate us if you hire them via our links or phone numbers. Reports of sexual assault have…
Kim Davis may not be a household name, but her actions in 2015 created a stir that did become a household story. For context as…
Please confirm you want to block this member.
You will no longer be able to:
Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.
Responses