Attorney’s ‘Groundless, Provocative, and Legally Meritless’ Against Judge’s Integrity Leads Indefinite Suspension

“What Marshall did not have the right to do was make serious, disparaging allegations impugning Judge Wechsler’s integrity as a judicial officer without a factual basis,” stated the opinion. “It was the groundless, provocative, and legally meritless quality of his allegations, not his filing of a motion to recuse, that we sanctioned.”


Related Articles


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *