Clarence Thomas *Really* Wants To Re-Write First Amendment Law
He won’t rest till NY Times v. Sullivan is a thing of the past.
The post Clarence Thomas *Really* Wants To Re-Write First Amendment Law appeared first on Above the Law.
Related Articles
Evaluating the Constitutionality of Viewpoint-Neutral Trademark Registration Laws That Do Not Restrict Speech—Vidal v. Elster (Guest Blog Post)
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey, Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section…
Two Separate Courts Reiterate That Online Age Authentication Mandates Are Unconstitutional
[I will blog the NetChoice v. Bonta ruling very soon.] Many state legislatures draft Internet regulations without any genuine concern for whether or not the…
Nate Preston: Taking the Lead on the Battlefield
Nate Preston: Taking the Lead on the Battlefield By Susan Cushing In the complex realm of personal injury law, attorneys who rise to the top…
Another Jawboning Case Fails in the 9th Circuit (But a TAFS Judge Doesn’t Like the Biden Administration)–Rogalinksi v. Meta
[I’m far behind in my blogging queue, especially with respect to the social media addiction rulings.] I previously summarized this case: Rogalinski made several posts…
Supreme Court Justice Most Dragged By The Press Wants To Weaken The First Amendment — See Also
Clarence Goes Out Of His Way To Revisit NYT v. Sullivan: I wonder why he feels that way. Who Isn’t Taking The 5th?: Trump and…
Responses