Law’s Reference to ‘Other Thing of Value’ Doesn’t Just Mean Monetary Value, Washington High Court Rules

While an intermediate appeals court found the defendant’s offer to live with her son “forever” if he killed his father didn’t constitute a “thing of value” within the meaning of the state law, RCW 9A.28.030(1), the state Supreme Court disagreed, reinstating her conviction for criminal solicitation.

       

Related Articles

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *