“Because the PCR court utilized a faulty analysis to conclude there was no merit to the speedy trial claim, it did not analyze counsel’s strategy in failing to assert Winchester’s right to a speedy trial at any stage of the proceedings,” Associate Justice Catherine R. Connors wrote on behalf of the unanimous court.
Catherine Turner: A Bright and Bold Defender By Susan Cushing America’s criminal justice system has been a hotbed for debate and controversy for decades. Some…
[I will blog the NetChoice v. Bonta ruling very soon.] Many state legislatures draft Internet regulations without any genuine concern for whether or not the…
Attorneys practicing divorce and family law have certain basic needs. They need to efficiently manage all their cases. They need to collect case details, documents…
Stefanie Lambert: Integrity, Courage & Faith By Katherine Bishop Stefanie Lambert is a name that resonates with integrity, courage and commitment to upholding the Constitution.…
As we begin our way into “spooky season,” it is only appropriate to begin this article with some spooky legal jokes. What is a skeleton’s…
Please confirm you want to block this member.
You will no longer be able to:
Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.
Responses