Twitter Account Suspension Lawsuits Keep Failing–Hall v. Twitter

This case involves a Twitter account held by Daniel Hall, who also used the aliases “Senza Vergogna” and “Sensa Verogna.” [Note: I believe those aliases reference an Italian movie about a son who engages in incest with his mom.] Hall made two problematic tweets in 2019 that triggered a 7-day lockout, followed by a permanent suspension. He sued Twitter claiming that Twitter’s suspension violated 42 U.S.C. § 1981; Title II of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a, and RSA 354-A:17; and his state and federal constitutional rights.

1981. Hall claimed Twitter discriminated against him because he’s white. The court says he didn’t sufficiently allege that causality. “At best, Hall alleges that Twitter discriminated against him because of his political beliefs, and that those beliefs are overwhelmingly held by white individuals.”

Civil Rights Act. “Companies, including Twitter, that provide only online services, however, are not places of public accommodation for the purposes of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” Cites to Lewis v. Google, Elansari v. Meta, and Martillo v. Twitter.

Constitutional Violations. “As Twitter argues, it is a private company, not a government or state actor, and Hall has not shown that the state action doctrine would apply in the circumstances of this case.” Cites to O’Handley v. Weber, Berenson v. Twitter, and Freedom Watch v. Google.

Twitter raised a Section 230 defense, but the court dismisses the case on other grounds and doesn’t address it. So this is yet another reminder that it’s not 230 protecting Twitter’s editorial freedom here. However, I am curious if Hall got reinvited back to Twitter post-Musk.

A periodic reminder that lawsuits over social media content removals and account terminations always fail.

Case citation: Hall v. Twitter, Inc., 2023 DNH 054 (D.N.H. May 9, 2023). The original complaint.

Selected Posts About State Action Claims

Twitter Defeats Account Suspension Case–Craft v. Musk
Government Submissions to a Trusted Flagger Program Aren’t Unconstitutional Jawboning–O’Handley v. Weber
Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Account Suspension for a Voting Misinformation “Joke”–Hall v. Meta
Prager’s Lawsuit Over Biased Content Moderation Decisively Fails Again (This Time, in State Court)–Prager v. YouTube
The 5th Circuit Puts the 1st Amendment in a Blender & Whips Up a Terrible #MAGA Kool-Aid–NetChoice v. Paxton
Facebook Defeats Jawboning Lawsuit Over COVID Misinformation Removal–Rogalinski v. Meta
Another Account Suspension Case Yeeted–Rangel v. Dorsey
Another Failed Lawsuit Over Trump’s Deplatforming–Rutenberg v. Twitter
COVID Skeptic Loses Lawsuit Over Account Terminations–Hart v. Facebook
Twitter Defeats Trump’s Deplatforming Lawsuit–Trump v. Twitter
Account Suspension Lawsuit Against Twitter Survives Motion to Dismiss–Berenson v. Twitter
Another Failed Lawsuit Over Facebook’s Content Removals–Brock v. Zuckerberg
Section 230 Survives Yet Another Constitutional Challenge–Huber v. Biden
Another Court Says Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–McWaters v. Houston
Another Anti-Vaxxer Jawboning Lawsuit Fails–ICAN v. YouTube
The First Amendment Protects Twitter’s Fact-Checking and Account Suspension Decisions–O’Handley v. Padilla
One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. Facebook
Two More Courts Tell Litigants That Social Media Services Aren’t State Actors
Government Jawboning Doesn’t Turn Internet Services into State Actors–Doe v. Google
Anti-Zionist Loses Lawsuit Over Social Media Account Suspensions–Martillo v. Facebook
Court Nopes Another Lawsuit Over Facebook Suspensions–Orders v. Facebook
Facebook Defeats Lawsuit By Publishers of Vaccine (Mis?)information–Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook
Court Rejects Lawsuit Alleging YouTube Engaged in Racially Biased Content Moderation–Newman v. Google
Yet Another Court Says Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Brock v. Zuckerberg
YouTube (Again) Defeats Lawsuit Over Content Removal–Lewis v. Google
When It Came to @RealDonaldTrump, Twitter Couldn’t Please Everyone–Rutenberg v. Twitter
Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet
Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. Astorian
An Account Suspension Case Fails Again–Perez v. LinkedIn
Are Social Media Services “State Actors” or “Common Carriers”?
Google and Twitter Defeat Lawsuit Over Account Suspensions/Terminations–DeLima v. Google
More Plaintiffs (and Lawyers) Need To Be Reminded That YouTube Isn’t a State Actor–Divino v. Google
Facebook Isn’t a Constructive Public Trust–Cameron Atkinson v. Facebook
Google and YouTube Aren’t “Censoring” Breitbart Comments–Belknap v. Alphabet
LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. LinkedIn
Section 230 Preempts Another Facebook Account Termination Case–Zimmerman v. Facebook
Section 230 Ends Demonetized YouTuber’s Lawsuit–Lewis v. Google
Court Rejects Another Lawsuit Alleging that Internet Companies Suppress Conservative Views–Freedom Watch v. Google
Another Suspended Twitter User Loses in Court–Wilson v. Twitter
First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. Google
YouTube Isn’t a State Actor (DUH)–PragerU v. Google
Facebook Still Isn’t Obligated to Publish Russian Troll Content–FAN v. Facebook
Vimeo Defeats Lawsuit for Terminating Account That Posted Conversion Therapy Videos–Domen v. Vimeo
Russia Fucked With American Democracy, But It Can’t Fuck With Section 230–Federal Agency of News v. Facebook
Private Publishers Aren’t State Actors–Manhattan Community Access v. Halleck
Your Periodic Reminder That Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Williby v. Zuckerberg
Section 230 Protects Facebook’s Account and Content Restriction Decisions–Ebeid v. Facebook
Court Tosses Antitrust Claims That Internet Giants Are Biased Against Conservatives–Freedom Watch v. Google
Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. Twitter
YouTube Isn’t a Company Town (Duh)–Prager University v. Google
Facebook Defeats Lawsuit By User Suspended Over ‘Bowling Green Massacre’–Shulman v. Facebook
Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. Yelp
Facebook Not Liable for Account Termination–Young v. Facebook
Online Game Network Isn’t Company Town–Estavillo v. Sony
Third Circuit Says Google Isn’t State Actor–Jayne v. Google Founders Not Liable for Search Results or Indexing Decisions–Murawski v. Pataki
Search Engines Defeat “Must-Carry” Lawsuit–Langdon v. Google
KinderStart Lawsuit Dismissed (With Leave to Amend)
ICANN Not a State Actor

The post Twitter Account Suspension Lawsuits Keep Failing–Hall v. Twitter appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.

Related Articles


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *