We Might Not Even Need The Supreme Court To Get Rid Of Legacy Admissions
Is Congress taking back its role as legislator?
The post We Might Not Even Need The Supreme Court To Get Rid Of Legacy Admissions appeared first on Above the Law.
Related Articles
Supreme Court’s Landmark Affirmative Action Decision Strikes Down Raced-Based Admissions
In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College and SFFA v. University of North Carolina, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the college admissions programs of Harvard…
Two Separate Courts Reiterate That Online Age Authentication Mandates Are Unconstitutional
[I will blog the NetChoice v. Bonta ruling very soon.] Many state legislatures draft Internet regulations without any genuine concern for whether or not the…
Voting Is Open! Pick the 15 Finalists to Compete At Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2024 in February
Voting is now open! Help pick the 15 legal tech startups that will get to compete at the eighth-annual Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2024.…
Evaluating the Constitutionality of Viewpoint-Neutral Trademark Registration Laws That Do Not Restrict Speech—Vidal v. Elster (Guest Blog Post)
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey, Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section…
The DTSA Ex Parte Seizure Provision Was Always Bad Policy–Janssen v. Evenus
In 2016, Congress enacted the Defend Trade Secret Act (DTSA). Among other provisions, it created a brand-new remedy, the ex parte seizure order, that allows…
Responses